The University of Southern California is facing backlash and controversy after announcing that its valedictorian, Asna Tabassum, would not be delivering a commencement address at the upcoming graduation ceremony on May 10. The decision came after campus Jewish organizations objected to her selection due to a pro-Palestinian social media link.
The university cited security concerns for canceling Tabassum’s speech, but she expressed shock and disappointment, questioning the school’s true motivation. In response to the decision, protests have erupted on campus calling for her reinstatement as a speaker.
In a surprising move, USC also announced that it would be eliminating outside speakers and honorees from the commencement program, including director Jon M. Chu and tennis star Billie Jean King. This decision came after inquiries from The New York Times about whether Chu would withdraw as the graduation speaker.
The American Civil Liberties Union of Southern California is now looking into the possibility of representing Tabassum in a lawsuit against the university, citing the California statute known as the Leonard Law, which protects free speech on college campuses.
As the controversy continues to unfold, many are questioning USC’s handling of the situation and whether the university is truly upholding its commitment to free speech and diversity. The decision to cancel Tabassum’s speech has sparked a larger conversation about the role of universities in fostering open dialogue and inclusivity on campus.
