President Biden’s recent endorsement of a plan for a “cessation of hostilities permanently” between Israel and Hamas has raised hopes for a potential resolution to the ongoing conflict. However, both parties have yet to definitively accept or reject the proposal, indicating that significant hurdles still lie ahead.
The proposed plan, as outlined by Mr. Biden and Israeli officials, is a three-phase process. The first phase involves a six-week cease-fire during which Israel would withdraw from population centers in Gaza and hostages held by Hamas would be exchanged for Palestinian detainees in Israeli prisons. Subsequent phases would see the full withdrawal of Israeli military forces from Gaza, the release of all hostages and prisoners, and a reconstruction period supported by the United States and other international entities.
Despite some positive responses from Hamas, key issues remain unresolved. Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has expressed concerns about the future role of Hamas and has emphasized the need to eliminate the group’s governing and military capabilities. Additionally, far-right partners in Netanyahu’s coalition have threatened to disrupt the government if a deal is reached without completely dismantling Hamas.
Hamas, on the other hand, has insisted on a permanent cease-fire, a total Israeli troop withdrawal, and a substantial prisoner exchange as part of any agreement. While some residents of Gaza are eager for an end to the conflict, Hamas leaders may be hesitant to agree to terms that could weaken their leverage in the long run.
As negotiations continue, the fate of the proposed cease-fire deal remains uncertain. Both Israel and Hamas must navigate complex political dynamics and competing interests to reach a lasting resolution to the conflict.
