Federal Judge Amit P. Mehta’s Antitrust Expertise Shines in Landmark Google Case
In late 2014, Federal Judge Amit P. Mehta found himself thrust into the world of antitrust law with one of his first cases involving Sysco’s attempted acquisition of US Foods. The Federal Trade Commission had sued to block the $3.5 billion deal, citing concerns about stifling competition.
Mehta, described as a tireless and bright student by lawyers on both sides, immersed himself in the details of antitrust law, asking sharp questions and ultimately delivering a comprehensive 128-page opinion that halted the deal. Sysco abandoned its acquisition plan soon after.
Now, Mehta is set to make another landmark antitrust decision in the case against Google, where the Justice Department and a group of state attorneys general allege that the tech giant illegally protected its monopoly in internet search. The closing arguments in this significant federal suit are currently underway, with Mehta’s ruling expected to set a precedent for future antitrust cases against other tech giants like Amazon, Apple, and Meta.
Despite his limited record of antitrust rulings, Mehta’s handling of the Sysco case and his meticulous approach to evidence assessment have earned him praise from former colleagues and legal experts. Known for his dedication to hard work and preparation, Mehta’s fair and thorough approach to trials has garnered respect in the legal community.
Born in India and raised in suburban Baltimore, Mehta’s journey to becoming a federal judge was marked by a commitment to public service and a diverse range of legal experiences. His recent involvement in high-profile cases, including the Google antitrust suit, has showcased his ability to navigate complex legal issues with precision and care.
As the trial against Google unfolds, Mehta’s attention to detail and commitment to upholding the law will be closely watched. With his reputation for thoroughness and fairness, Mehta’s ruling in the Google case is expected to carry significant weight and may shape the future of antitrust enforcement in the United States.
