The United States’ Evolving Stance on Gaza Cease-Fire Resolutions at the United Nations
In a significant shift in policy, the United States presented a resolution at the United Nations Security Council on Friday calling for an “immediate and sustained cease-fire” in Gaza, marking a departure from its previous stance of vetoing similar resolutions. The resolution, which aimed to pause the ongoing conflict between Israel and Hamas, failed to pass after being vetoed by Russia and China.
The United States has traditionally used its veto power as a permanent Security Council member to block measures that Israel, its close ally, opposes. However, the Biden administration has been increasingly critical of Israel’s approach to the war against Hamas, leading to a change in its position at the U.N.
A look back at the three previous resolutions reveals the evolution of the U.S. stance on the issue. In October, the U.S. was the sole no vote against a resolution condemning Hamas-led attacks on Israel, citing the lack of mention of Israel’s right to self-defense. In December, the U.S. again dissented against a cease-fire resolution, expressing concerns about civilian casualties in Gaza but emphasizing the need for Israel’s right to self-defense.
By February, as international pressure mounted on Israel and the death toll in Gaza rose, the U.S. once more voted against a cease-fire resolution, arguing that it could jeopardize negotiations for the release of hostages. However, the U.S. also drafted a rival resolution calling for a temporary humanitarian cease-fire, signaling a shift towards a more nuanced approach.
The resolution presented on Friday represented the strongest language the United States has supported at the U.N., calling for an “immediate and sustained” halt to the fighting. The evolving U.S. position reflects a growing recognition of the need for a diplomatic solution to the conflict in Gaza, highlighting the complex dynamics at play in the region.
